Practical Uses of AI in Clinical Trial

14th June 2024 by Akshay Sharma | Healthcare

Practical Uses of AI in Clinical Trial

Clinical trials (CTs) remain the cornerstone of ensuring the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical drug development. In light of the evolving landscape of data-driven and personalized medicine within healthcare, it becomes imperative for both companies and regulators to embrace tailored Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions that can facilitate efficient and streamlined clinical research processes. This paper explores the identified opportunities, challenges, and potential implications of integrating AI into CTs.

To compile this analysis, an exhaustive search was conducted across pertinent databases and websites, collating publications that specifically addressed the application of AI and Machine Learning (ML) in CTs over the past five years. The focus extended to the United States and Europe, encompassing relevant documents from regulatory authorities.

The documented applications of AI predominantly center around the oncology field, with a primary focus on enhancing recruitment processes. The main opportunities recognized in the literature are geared towards optimizing various aspects of CT activities. These include the potential to reduce sample sizes, enhance enrollment processes, and facilitate the expedited execution of adaptive CTs, thus promoting greater efficiency in the overall clinical research landscape. While the development of AI in this realm is marked by enthusiasm, the challenges identified are predominantly ethical in nature. Issues such as data availability, standards, and, notably, the absence of clear regulatory guidance are hindrances to the widespread acceptance of AI tools in drug development.

Looking ahead, the anticipated implications of incorporating AI into CTs are substantial. There is an optimistic outlook towards improving the probability of trial success, alleviating the burden associated with trials, and ultimately accelerating both the pace of research and regulatory approval processes. The synthesis of AI with clinical research holds the promise of transforming traditional paradigms, fostering a more efficient and effective landscape for drug development within the ever-evolving healthcare ecosystem.

INSIGHTS: Since its conceptualization in 1955, artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved into the scientific and engineering discipline dedicated to creating intelligent computer programs. It is defined as an entity capable of receiving and interpreting environmental inputs, learning from them, and displaying flexible behaviors to achieve specific goals. The overarching aim of AI is to replicate human intelligence processes, including learning, reasoning, and self-correction. In the realm of health care, AI has emerged as a comprehensive solution to various management challenges. Global expenditure on AI is anticipated to reach $52.2 billion in 2021, with pharmaceutical research experiencing a rapid growth rate of 70.5% CAGR between 2016 and 2021.

AI encompasses diverse techniques, including machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and optical character recognition. Machine learning, widely applied in the pharmaceutical industry, employs algorithms to extract features from data for predictive modeling. Deep learning, a subset of machine learning, utilizes artificial neural networks with multiple hidden layers for complex data extraction. Natural language processing and optical character recognition are employed in drug development to extract meaning from textual information and convert images of text into machine-encoded text, respectively. In health care, AI applications span various domains such as disease prediction, diagnosis, treatment, personalized medicine, drug discovery, and clinical trial research. Despite its potential in addressing challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, AI faced limitations related to data availability, privacy concerns, and data overload.

Presenting an audit of 159 AI studies registered in, focusing on oncology, cardiology, ophthalmology, psychiatry, and neurology. While the authors identify the most common studies, there is a notable absence of discussion on study quality. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of over 30,000 AI-based diagnostic studies found that the diagnostic performance of deep learning models was comparable to that of health-care professionals, but less than 1% of studies met high-quality design and reporting standards. Recent guidelines, such as SPIRIT-AI Extension and CONSORT-AI Extension, aim to enhance transparency and completeness in clinical trial protocols involving AI. For the pharmaceutical industry, AI proves to be a versatile tool across all stages of drug development, from target identification to clinical trial conduct and pharmacovigilance. Deep learning has demonstrated success in identifying potential drug candidates and improving prediction of their properties and safety risks. AI systems also enhance patient selection in clinical trials, reducing population heterogeneity and enabling prognostic and predictive enrichment.

AI's integration with wearable technology facilitates real-time, personalized patient monitoring during trials, improving compliance and endpoint assessment. AI-based applications like AiCure have demonstrated increased medication adherence in clinical trials for conditions such as schizophrenia. Despite these advancements, the implementation of AI faces challenges related to data accessibility, harmonization, interoperability, and regulatory constraints on data privacy.

Regulatory bodies, including the FDA, view AI/ML-based software as medical devices and expect compliance with stringent validation, safety, and transparency standards. However, the adoption of AI technology is hindered by challenges such as the availability of skilled personnel and concerns about job displacement. The realization of AI's benefits in the pharmaceutical industry demands substantial investments of time, effort, and financial resources, suggesting a learning curve for both man and machine that spans 5 to 8 years. In essence, AI is a transformative force, but its successful integration requires meticulous attention to regulatory, ethical, and personnel considerations.

Advancing Drug Development through Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Implications

The enduring acceptance of evidence generated by clinical trials (CTs) as the gold standard for the development of safe and effective drugs is juxtaposed against the significant investment and inherent risks faced by pharmaceutical companies. Acknowledging the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) to revolutionize and optimize drug development, this paper delves into the myriad applications of AI in CTs, reflecting the burgeoning interest and practical exploration in this intersection. The exponential growth of randomized trials, yielding vast and intricate datasets comprising clinical, molecular, and imaging information, underscores the pivotal role of data in the era of data-driven and personalized medicine. While data availability is a linchpin for these trends, the paper emphasizes that actionable insights necessitate comprehensive AI models developed and trained with appropriate datasets to expedite and streamline diverse drug research activities.

The literature reveals a spectrum of opportunities attributable to AI, particularly in niche areas like rare diseases and targeted therapies where the return on investment might traditionally deter profitability. Beyond these, the paper discusses the potential for AI to enhance efficiency in patient recruitment, protocol design, and patient monitoring, thereby augmenting the likelihood of trial success and influencing the measurement and interpretation of results. The primary objective of this research is to distill insights from literature, delineating the opportunities, challenges, and future implications of integrating AI into CTs. With companies globally contemplating strategic AI applications and regulators endeavoring to adapt to this paradigm shift, the review serves as a compass for decision-making and a roadmap for potential regulations in this dynamic landscape. Utilizing the broader terms of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) rather than specific methods aligns with the paper's focus on identifying opportunities, challenges, and implications, steering away from technical intricacies to provide a comprehensive overview of the transformative potential of AI in drug development.

Revolutionizing Pre-clinical Research with AI: Unleashing New Targets and Predicting Toxicity

In the realm of pre-clinical research, Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerges as a transformative force, poised to address unmet medical needs by expediting the discovery of novel molecular targets and predicting toxicity with unprecedented precision. AI's capacity to swiftly identify new genes or proteins as potential targets for therapeutic interventions holds the promise of significantly accelerating drug development. However, the realization of this potential hinges on access to extensive pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) datasets, drawn not only from prior preclinical investigations but also from clinical research, including data from unsuccessful trials. The development and training of robust algorithms capable of generating stable molecules with genuine therapeutic potential depend on the availability of such comprehensive datasets. A notable impediment to fully unlocking AI's potential in new drug discovery lies in the reluctance to publish PK/PD data for competitive or proprietary reasons, underscoring a significant hurdle that needs to be addressed.

AI's role in predicting drug toxicity represents a paradigm shift in pre-clinical approaches. Various methodologies have been devised to forecast safety concerns based on target information, offering a potential alternative to conventional in vitro and animal models. Moreover, these AI models serve as invaluable risk-management and prioritization tools within development pipelines. By providing early indications of high-risk compounds with substantial safety concerns, they enable a proactive approach to compound selection, streamlining the drug development process.

However, the application of AI in the early phases of research introduces challenges, particularly in terms of model interpretation. The inherent uncertainty during these stages necessitates a nuanced understanding of model features and the underlying biological mechanisms. Achieving interpretability is crucial for instilling confidence in predictions, thereby reinforcing the reliability and effectiveness of AI-driven insights in pre-clinical research. As the field continues to evolve, addressing data-sharing concerns and refining interpretability will be pivotal in realizing the full potential of AI to revolutionize the identification of therapeutic targets and toxicity prediction in drug development.

Elevating Clinical Trial Design with Artificial Intelligence: Unleashing Precision and Efficiency

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in clinical trial design marks a transformative leap toward precision medicine and streamlined processes. AI's prowess in predicting patient outcomes stands out as a game-changer, enabling the elimination of statistical variability in general populations and facilitating the design of trials tailored to individual characteristics. By simulating data with AI algorithms, more efficient statistical outcome measures can be identified, potentially leading to shorter trial durations. AI's ability to predict participant outcomes and identify fast progressors could revolutionize trial timelines, while its analysis of Electronic Medical Records offers insights into the likelihood of trial dropouts, enabling targeted interventions to encourage longer participation and reducing overall sample sizes.

In the context of cancer trials, Machine Learning (ML) prediction models demonstrate a remarkable reduction in cancer mortality, leveraging clinical outcome predictions stratified by environmental and genetic attributes. These models, fueled by large biologic databases, correlate drug-related predictive biomarkers with survival data, offering a paradigm shift in drug selection and adaptability to specific cancer histologies, ultimately enhancing survival rates. The evolution of ML models incorporating comprehensive multi-omic data holds the potential to redefine precision trial designs.

Beyond predicting patient outcomes, AI exhibits a pivotal role in anticipating the probability of trial success. ML algorithms aid in early disease detection, prognostication, and prediction of molecular features, target sensitivity, bioavailability, and toxicity, thereby reducing the likelihood of late-stage trial failures. Informed by clinical trial design and patient characteristic datasets, these models not only predict regulatory approval but also estimate the probability of success in phase transitions, influencing trial design factors such as protocol complexity, clinical endpoints, interventional arms, and eligibility criteria.

AI's impact extends to reshaping clinical trial design by accelerating hypothesis generation, enhancing disease understanding, improving drug discovery, optimizing cohort composition, monitoring adherence, and selecting endpoints. The implementation of AI methodologies leads to improved outcomes, as seen in the refinement of cohort composition through protocol enrichment and biomarker verification. Moreover, AI tools could revolutionize the concept of a placebo arm by predicting disease progression within a virtual control arm, potentially replacing the need for a placebo group with synthetic data. This innovation holds promises of reduced budgets, diminished site and patient burdens, and faster trials.

However, challenges abound on this transformative journey. The scarcity of high-quality, curated datasets limits AI applications, particularly in building In-Silico trials within the oncology domain. Collaborative efforts are imperative to establish common protocols for data collection and organization, mitigating errors in AI output. While the prospect of synthetic control arms holds potential benefits, ethical considerations and concerns about health information misuse must be carefully navigated. In essence, the integration of AI in clinical trial design is a powerful catalyst for precision medicine, but its realization demands concerted efforts, multidisciplinary expertise, and an unwavering commitment to ethical considerations.

Overcoming Recruitment Challenges in Clinical Trials: Harnessing the Power of AI

Recruiting participants for clinical trials remains a formidable challenge, exerting a significant impact on trial timelines and associated financial costs. The complexities inherent in trial protocols, coupled with factors such as a lack of awareness, emotional apprehensions, and a general disinterest in participation, contribute to the intricate landscape of recruitment hurdles. In this milieu, the inclusion and exclusion criteria are progressively becoming more intricate, demanding precise patient matching to meet stringent selection criteria and avoid potential confounders or misclassifications.

Addressing this challenge, AI emerges as a potent ally, offering innovative solutions to enhance and streamline the recruitment process. AI tools, drawing from diverse datasets encompassing demographic, laboratory, imaging, and -omics data, demonstrate the ability to effectively match patients with complex inclusion criteria. By leveraging large-scale datasets, these tools ensure a more precise and tailored approach to patient recruitment, mitigating the risk of selecting participants prone to confounding variables.

Moreover, the potential for automated trial recommendations signifies a paradigm shift, where AI contributes to patient selection by disseminating information to a broader audience through public clinical trial platforms. This approach not only enhances awareness but also broadens the pool of potential trial participants, making the recruitment process more inclusive and accessible. AI tools, when applied to datasets in the metabolic domain, have been shown to support fairer trial access, presenting a significant and ethically important implication.

In the broader context, AI-driven approaches contribute to the evolution of clinical trial searching, acting as matching engines that efficiently connect potential participants with relevant trials. This transformative potential is exemplified in a study focused on HIV, where AI played a pivotal role in enhancing awareness, engagement, and ultimately, recruitment.

As clinical trials navigate the complexities of patient recruitment, the integration of AI offers a promising solution to streamline the process, ensure precise patient matching, and foster inclusivity. By harnessing the power of AI, the clinical research landscape stands to benefit from improved efficiency, enhanced participant engagement, and ultimately, accelerated advancements in medical research.

Advancing Trial Conduct through Digital Health Technologies and AI: Enhancing Safety Oversight and Adherence Monitoring

The incorporation of digital health technologies (DHTs) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in trial conduct represents a significant leap forward, offering near-real-time access to valuable insights through automated data collection tools and novel digital biomarkers. Utilizing AI algorithms to interpret data gathered from wearable devices and sensors provides investigational sites with visualizations of participants' conditions, particularly benefiting those with life-threatening or debilitating conditions by enhancing safety oversight through swift access to actionable insights.

In the realm of psychiatric and neurological disorders, AI presents a groundbreaking solution to the persistent challenge of adherence to Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP). While existing technologies track when participants open their IMP, the accuracy of this data is often questionable. AI steps in to provide a more reliable method of monitoring and confirming IMP intake. Video capture devices equipped with AI algorithms offer a robust means of verifying participant medication intake, offering a practical alternative to on-site staff observation, which may not always be feasible.

AI's influence extends to the analysis and workflow management of medical images, streamlining review processes and enhancing efficiency. AI algorithms contribute to the automated annotation of crucial markers, a task traditionally performed manually by experts. Moreover, AI can optimize imaging review workflows by incorporating automated image classification tools, ultimately accelerating the reading time for experts. However, a notable challenge in this domain is the resource-intensive effort required to build a repository of high-quality, standardized images essential for training algorithms.

As the integration of DHTs and AI transforms trial conduct activities, it presents a dual advantage of improving safety oversight and addressing adherence challenges, particularly in conditions where continuous monitoring is critical. Additionally, the streamlined analysis of medical images showcases the potential for AI to enhance efficiency and accuracy, revolutionizing the way trial conduct unfolds. Despite challenges, the prospects for improved trial conduct through the synergy of DHTs and AI hold promise for more effective and patient-centric clinical research.

Unleashing AI's Analytical Prowess in Clinical Trials: From Effect Heterogeneity to Automation

Effect heterogeneity, a recurring challenge for clinical trial statisticians, finds a potential solution in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Trained on cardiovascular datasets, AI applications delve into clinical trial data, identifying subgroups with varying treatment effects, discerning key risk factors, and pinpointing fast responders within specific populations. While these tools promise more comprehensive analyses and richer insights for drug developers, the hurdle of regulatory acceptance underscores the need for researchers to establish robust validation methods for the results generated by these novel AI models.

The disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic further underscore the versatility of AI in clinical trial analysis. With many trials experiencing missing data and delayed study visits due to resource reassignment, travel difficulties, and participant health issues, Machine Learning (ML) emerges as a valuable tool for imputing missing data and inferring a participant's condition when visits extend beyond the protocol-defined windows. The adaptability of AI in handling the intricacies introduced by the pandemic showcases its potential to bolster resilience in the face of unforeseen challenges.

In the pursuit of enhanced efficiency and accuracy, AI tools are poised to support the automation of data extraction into statistical analysis tools. By minimizing manual efforts and mitigating the risks associated with human error, these tools contribute to a more streamlined and error-resistant analytical process. Yet, challenges persist in this domain, necessitating extensive efforts to develop and validate algorithms that align with the specific needs and nuances of clinical trial data analysis.

As AI continues to carve its path in clinical trial analysis, the potential for uncovering nuanced treatment effects, handling missing data, and automating analytical processes presents a paradigm shift in the way clinical trials are conducted. While regulatory acceptance and algorithm validation remain critical considerations, the transformative impact of AI on clinical trial analysis holds promise for a future where insights are richer, processes are more resilient, and efficiency is paramount.

Practical Uses of AI in Clinical Trial

In conclusion, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in various stages of clinical trials presents a transformative potential across multiple facets of drug development and trial management. From the inception of novel drug targets in pre-clinical research to the intricate design and efficient conduct of trials, AI emerges as a catalyst for precision medicine and enhanced efficiency. In pre-clinical research, AI's ability to expedite target discovery and predict toxicity addresses unmet medical needs, but challenges such as data accessibility and standardization need to be navigated. The design phase benefits from AI's capacity to predict patient outcomes, optimize trial success probabilities, and reshape trial designs. Challenges here include interpretability and ethical considerations. Recruitment hurdles, a persistent challenge in clinical trials, find a solution in AI's ability to match patients with complex inclusion criteria and automate trial recommendations. This not only streamlines the recruitment process but also contributes to fairer trial access. However, data-sharing concerns and ethical considerations must be addressed.

The conduct of clinical trials is revolutionized through the incorporation of digital health technologies and AI, enhancing safety oversight, improving adherence monitoring, and streamlining image analysis workflows. Challenges include the resource-intensive nature of building standardized image repositories.In the analysis phase, AI's role in determining effect heterogeneity, imputing missing data, and automating data extraction into statistical tools offers comprehensive insights and efficiency gains. Regulatory acceptance, algorithm validation, and data quality remain pivotal challenges.

While the potential benefits of AI in clinical trials are evident, challenges in data accessibility, standardization, ethical considerations, and regulatory acceptance need concerted efforts from researchers, industry stakeholders, and regulatory bodies. As the industry navigates these challenges, the adoption of AI stands poised to usher in a new era of precision medicine, streamlined processes, and improved patient outcomes in clinical trials.

Akshay Sharma

Research Associate

A dynamic market research specialist with expertise in industry research, market assessment, competitive intelligence, and strategic market intelligence to provide information for business decisions.

Let's Connect

Let's Talk